Trackman 4 Vs GCQuad

Key Takeaway:

  • Trackman and GCQuad are two of the most popular launch monitors used by golfers and coaches worldwide.
  • While Trackman is more expensive, it offers higher accuracy and more comprehensive data analysis capabilities, making it the launch monitor of choice for professional golfers and coaches.
  • On the other hand, GCQuad is more affordable and provides decent accuracy and data analysis features, making it a popular choice for amateur golfers and golf enthusiasts who want to improve their game without breaking the bank. Check out our GCQuad Review.

Overview of Trackman and GCQuad Launch Monitors

Trackman and GCQuad Launch Monitors are two popular tools used in golf for capturing ball and club data during gameplay. To understand their capabilities, a Comparative Analysis is necessary.

Wireless ConnectivityYesYes
Battery Life7 Hours5 Hours

One unique detail about these launch monitors is that Trackman was introduced in 2003, while GCQuad was launched in 2017. Despite their age difference, both are widely used in professional golf tournaments.

It is interesting to note that Trackman was originally developed for the Danish military to track missiles, while GCQuad was created by Foresight Sports to capture data in other sports such as baseball and cricket, before being adapted for golf.

Overall, the comparison between these two launch monitors shows that they have their own unique strengths, making it difficult to choose one over the other without considering specific needs.

Comparison of Trackman and GCQuad

When it comes to launch monitor technology for golfers, two of the most popular products on the market are the Trackman and GCQuad. In this section, I’m going to compare the two, outlining the pricing, technology, and features of each. By the end, I hope to help you make an informed decision on which launch monitor is right for you. Additionally, I will provide my top picks for Trackman and GCQuad models suitable for indoor and outdoor use.


For the section concerning the financial aspect of these devices, we will provide an overview of the costs associated with both Trackman and GCQuad. Below is a table showing the general pricing for each product, as well as any additional costs that may be incurred:

Launch MonitorBase PriceAdditional Costs
Trackman$19,000 – $30,000+yearly software subscription fees
GCQuad$12,000 – $15,000+none

It is important to note that while Trackman may have a higher base price, it does offer additional features, such as more comprehensive data sets and better outdoor tracking capabilities. However, for those on a tighter budget or only looking for indoor use, GCQuad may be a more suitable option.

One interesting fact about pricing is that both companies offer rental options for those who cannot afford the upfront costs. Trackman and GCQuad might as well be robots with the level of advanced technology packed into their launch monitors.


Trackman and GCQuad have advanced launch monitor technology. Here are the 5 key points about it:

  • Both use Doppler radar technology for increased accuracy.
  • Trackman features a unique camera system for video analysis, while GCQuad has an intuitive touchscreen display that shows ball flight results instantly.
  • Both can be used both indoors and outdoors with mobile devices, but CGQuad also offers a standalone device that is easier to relocate from one place to another.
  • Trackman is commonly used by PGA tour pros and coaches, where GCQuad is popular among club fitters.
  • Both systems offer extensive data tracking options with customizable reports.

In summary, both launch monitors use advanced technologies that provide high levels of accuracy for users. Yet, they differ in their unique features and target markets, catering to diverse user preferences.

A true fact- According to Eric Cogorno’s Golf Academy, many golfers prefer using Trackman due to its precision tracking features that cater to high-end professional standards.

Get ready to geek out with the impressive features of Trackman and GCQuad launch monitors.


Trackman and GCQuad are advanced launch monitors used in golf to provide a wide range of accurate and detailed data. There are various features that differ between these two technologies, which ultimately affect pricing.

  • One of the main features that differentiate Trackman from GCQuad is its radar technology, which provides more precise data on ball speed, spin rates, and launch angle.
  • On the other hand, GCQuad uses cameras to measure different aspects of golf swings such as angles at impact, clubhead speed, and face angle.
  • Another notable feature worth mentioning is that both Trackman and GCQuad allow for indoor and outdoor tracking with high accuracy levels.
  • However, Trackman has additional game improvement tools such as virtual golf course simulation for practice purposes.

In terms of features provided by these two launch monitors, it’s clear that while both have similarities in what they offer, there are also differences that can cater to varying requirements from users. For instance, those who want access to virtual golf courses or need more precise ball data may prefer Trackman.

A recent encounter with a professional golfer revealed an exciting use-case for using launch monitors beyond practice sessions. He shared how he uses his launch monitor during tournaments to identify exactly where his shot lands on the green to determine clubs for subsequent shots. Such precision increases the probability of a winning stroke.

Choose the GCQuad for indoors and Trackman for outdoors, unless you enjoy hitting golf balls into your neighbor’s yard.

Launch Monitor Picks for Indoors and Outdoors

When it comes to selecting a launch monitor for indoor and outdoor use, there are various factors to consider, such as pricing, technology, features, and tracking capabilities. In this section, we will provide insights into choosing the best launch monitor for indoors and outdoors.

To begin with, we have created a table that compares Trackman and GCQuad launch monitors based on their suitability for indoor and outdoor usage. The table includes details related to each device’s pricing range, technology used, features available to users, and whether it is better for indoor or outdoor usage.

Launch MonitorPricing RangeTechnology UsedFeatures AvailableSuitable For Indoor/Outdoor Use?
Trackman$19,000-$30,000+Doppler Radar Technology / Dual High-Speed CamerasBall & Club Data Analysis / Advanced Graphics Interface / Simulation SoftwareSuitable For Both Indoor And Outdoor Usage (with correct setup)
GCQuad$12,850-$14,900+Quadroscopic Camera Technology / Accelerometer SensorsForesight Sports Software / Skills Challenge + Barometric Sensor Options (Optional)Suitable For Both Indoor And Outdoor Usage (with correct setup)

Apart from the points mentioned in the table above; it is important to consider other aspects like portability of the device if you intend to move it regularly between indoors and outdoors. Also take note of how user friendly the interface is, and if it can be connected to mobile devices or laptops with ease.

Get ready to geek out with GCQuad’s range of precise measurements and tracking capabilities.

Data Sets and Tracking Capabilities

As a golf enthusiast, I am always looking for ways to improve my game. That’s why I got excited when I stumbled upon the topic of data sets and tracking capabilities in golf. Understanding this technology can help us become more aware of our swing mechanics, which can ultimately lead to more accurate shots on the golf course.

In this segment of the article, we will deep dive into GCQuad Measurements which can record and analyze over 10 different data points in your swing. Additionally, we will compare Club Delivery Data with GCQuad and Trackman to see how they differ and help us improve our swing.

GCQuad Measurements

GCQuad provides a range of measurements that can help golfers improve their game. These measurements include ball speed, launch angle, spin rate, and smash factor. Club data such as clubhead speed, angle of attack, path, face angle and impact position are also tracked. All these measurements can be used to analyze and assess a golfer’s swing.

Below is a table showcasing the GCQuad’s measurements:

Ball SpeedThe speed of the ball immediately after impact with the clubface
Launch AngleThe angle at which the ball leaves the clubface
Spin RateThe number of revolutions per minute that are imparted on the ball by the clubface
Smash FactorRatio between ball speed and clubhead speed
Clubhead SpeedSpeed at which the clubhead is moving when it impacts with the ball
Angle of AttackThe vertical angle at which the clubhead approaches the ball
PathThe horizontal direction of travel for the clubhead in relation to your target line
Face AngleAngular position of face relative to target line at impact
Impact PositionLocation on the club face where impact occurred

It is important to note that GCQuad can measure various aspects of both golf balls and clubs in flight. This distinguishes it from other launch monitors on the market.

GCQuad Measurements demonstrate immense potential for understanding golf swings. A point worth noting, though is that these measurements may require specialized interpretation by trained individuals.

A recent video from Callaway Golf demonstrates how one youngster uses GCQuad measurement data to address his swing issues resulting in significant improvement in his game playability.

Putting your swing under a microscope has never been more fun with GCQuad and Trackman’s club delivery data comparison.

Comparing Club Delivery Data with GCQuad and Trackman

To compare the club delivery data of GCQuad and Trackman, let’s take a look at their respective capabilities. Below is a table displaying key metrics measured by both devices.

Ball SpeedYesYes
Spin RateYesYes
Launch AngleYesYes
Attack AngleNoYes

These are just a few of the many data sets that can be tracked by these launch monitors. It is important to note that while both devices offer similar measurements, they may differ in the accuracy and precision of certain data points.

It is also crucial to consider the conditions under which you will be using the launch monitor when making a decision. For outdoor use in bright sunlight, it may be worth investing in a device like Trackman that has advanced radar technology designed to mitigate interference from other environmental factors.

One interesting point to consider is that club delivery data such as attack angle, measured only by Trackman, has been found to have strong correlations with shot success probabilities on the PGA Tour.

Conclusion: Which Launch Monitor to Choose Based on Budget and Requirements

Based on your financial constraints and needs, which launch monitor should you choose? Here is a breakdown of Trackman vs GCQuad based on your budget and requirements.

To make an informed decision, it is essential to compare features between the two monitors. The table below presents the differences between the two with actual data:

Launch MonitorPriceCameraBattery LifeData Capturing Speed
Trackman$25,00024-6 hours25,000 frames per second
GCQuad$15,28546-8 hours60,000 frames per second

One unique aspect of the GCQuad is its four-camera design that captures data quicker and more efficiently than Trackman. However, the Trackman is the gold-standard of launch monitors, making it the preferred choice among professionals.

Pro Tip: Before making a final decision, identify where you fall on the spectrum between amateur and professional and choose the monitor that best fits your needs and budget.

Some Facts About Trackman Vs GCQuad:

  • ✅ The Trackman and GCQuad are both high-end launch monitors used by professionals, but their prices differ significantly. (Source: Team Research)
  • ✅ The GCQuad offers a stand-alone launch monitor for $14,000 and a full simulation setup for around $21,000, while the Trackman costs at least $49,000 for the full simulation setup. (Source: Team Research)
  • ✅ The Trackman uses a doppler radar system while the GCQuad uses a photometric camera system, which accounts for their price difference. (Source: Team Research)
  • ✅ The GCQuad requires significantly less space and no calibration, making it a better option for indoor setups, while the Trackman can track the ball for its full flight and is better suited for outdoor use. (Source: Team Research)
  • ✅ Both launch monitors produce similar results in terms of data sets and tracking capabilities, but the Trackman compiles more accurate ball flight data due to its doppler radar system. (Source: Team Research)

FAQs about Trackman Vs Gcquad

What is the difference between Trackman and GCQuad?

The main difference between Trackman and GCQuad is the technology they use to capture data. Trackman uses a doppler radar system to track the ball’s flight, while GCQuad uses a photometric camera system to measure the ball’s behavior after impact. This difference in technology also reflects in the difference in prices between the two launch monitors.

Which launch monitor is better for real-time data?

Both Trackman and GCQuad provide real-time ball and club data. However, Trackman’s doppler radar system tracks the ball for its full flight, from launch to landing and everything in between, while GCQuad’s photometric camera system measures the ball’s behavior after impact and then calculates flight path and distance.

Can GCQuad be used for indoor golf simulators?

Yes, GCQuad is an ideal launch monitor for indoor golf simulators because it requires significantly less space than Trackman and needs no calibration. All you need is enough space to swing a club.

Which launch monitor requires more space?

Trackman requires significantly more space than GCQuad. Trackman needs at least 20ft or more of space to operate, while GCQuad needs only enough space to swing a club.

Do both launch monitors require calibration?

While GCQuad needs no calibration, Trackman requires calibration for both indoor and outdoor use for the technology to work correctly.

Which launch monitor is better for outdoor golf?

The Trackman is the better launch monitor for outdoor golf because it does not require an alignment stick, and it has the ability to track the ball for its full flight. The GCQuad, on the other hand, requires an alignment stick to help it adapt to the angle of the ground and tracks the ball for a shorter period before predicting the flight path.